This website outlines specific, actionable reforms designed to strengthen American democracy and restore trust in our institutions.

Lobbying in its current form allows wealthy individuals, corporations, and special interests to buy disproportionate influence over the legislative process. Through large campaign donations, lucrative post-office job offers, gifts, and other transfers of value, policymakers are often incentivized to act in ways that benefit those with money and power rather than the citizens they were elected to serve. While technically regulated, these practices have created an uneven playing field where access to lawmakers is effectively sold to the highest bidder. The result is a political environment where ordinary voices are marginalized and policymaking is skewed toward the interests of donors and lobbyists.

This dynamic has eroded public trust in government and created a system that, to many, looks indistinguishable from legalized bribery. Instead of reflecting the collective needs of communities, legislation frequently reflects the priorities of wealthy industries and individuals who can afford to “invest” in political outcomes. Without meaningful reform, lobbying perpetuates a cycle of dependency between elected officials and special interests, undermining democracy itself. Eliminating the exchange of money or material benefit for political action is therefore essential to restore accountability, integrity, and faith in representative government.

Click here for the proposed Legislation / Amendment

We value your perspective on this reform proposal. FACT for America uses a democratic process for choosing which issues and the priorities of the issues that we are focused on. Please share your feedback!

Key data sources:

Campos, Nauro F., and Francesco Giovannoni. Lobbying, Corruption and Political Influence. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2313, 2006. This influential paper finds that in many political systems, lobbying serves as a substitute for direct corruption—producing similar outcomes by purchasing access and influence through legal means. It supports the argument that lobbying, when tied to monetary or material exchanges, functions as de facto bribery.

Borisov, Alexander, Eitan Goldman, and Nandini Gupta. The Corporate Value of (Corrupt) Lobbying. Review of Financial Studies, 2016. The authors show that firms investing heavily in lobbying gain abnormal market advantages, and that anti-lobbying reforms directly reduce these advantages, implying that such lobbying behavior contains elements of corruption.

This presentation has outlined critical reforms designed to restore integrity, accountability, and public trust in our democratic institutions. From campaign finance to ethical standards, these proposals aim to ensure a government truly by and for the people. We know it will take hard work and will not be easy to enact this

All Inquiries: info@factamerica.org

Phone: 888-467-7897

Donate:

Connect with FACT for America on social media:

The Anti-Corruption and Anti-Lobbying Reform Act / Amendment is not simply a policy reform — it is an essential safeguard for the survival of democracy in the United States. For decades, the line between lobbying and bribery has been deliberately blurred, allowing private interests, corporations, and wealthy individuals to purchase access and influence over elected officials. This system has effectively transformed governance into a marketplace where public policy is sold to the highest bidder. The result is a government that too often prioritizes profit over people, and private power over public will. By constitutionally prohibiting the exchange of money, gifts, or any thing of value intended to influence official action, this amendment restores the original intent of representative democracy — that elected leaders serve the people, not those who can afford to buy their votes.

This amendment also addresses a fundamental flaw in modern campaign finance: the dependence of politicians on large donors and special interests for survival. Even well-meaning officials are trapped in a cycle of perpetual fundraising, where the necessity of financial backing overshadows the duty to govern ethically. Legislative decisions, regulatory outcomes, and national priorities are increasingly shaped in backrooms, not ballot boxes. A constitutional amendment ensures this cycle cannot continue. It creates a bright, enforceable line — no money or material value can be exchanged in connection with public decision-making — closing the loopholes that have allowed “legalized bribery” to masquerade as free speech.

Finally, the amendment is not anti-business or anti-expression — it is pro-democracy. It guarantees that every citizen has an equal voice in shaping the policies that affect their lives, without being drowned out by billion-dollar lobbies and political action committees. It will rebuild trust in government by making transparency and integrity constitutional principles, not political promises. This is not a partisan issue; it is a moral and civic imperative. The Anti-Corruption Amendment redefines American democracy as it was always meant to be — a system of Fairness, Anti-Corruption, and Transparency for all.

The Congressional and Judicial Term Limits Amendment is designed to restore accountability, transparency, and balance within the U.S. government by preventing the entrenchment of political and judicial power. Currently, members of Congress can serve indefinitely through repeated reelections, and Supreme Court justices hold lifetime appointments, allowing political influence and generational bias to persist for decades. This structure fosters stagnation, weakens democratic responsiveness, and distances elected officials and judges from the evolving will of the people they serve. The amendment seeks to break this cycle, ensuring that public service remains a privilege of limited duration rather than a lifelong career.

Under this proposal, members of Congress would be limited to twelve years of total service, whether in the House or Senate, preventing the accumulation of entrenched influence and encouraging the emergence of new leaders and perspectives. Supreme Court justices would serve a single eighteen-year term, while lower federal judges would serve twelve-year renewable terms. These limits would promote judicial independence by reducing the strategic timing of retirements and political manipulation of court appointments. Additionally, a staggered system would ensure that one Supreme Court appointment occurs every two years, creating a predictable, nonpartisan process that reflects long-term democratic balance rather than partisan control.

The amendment reinforces the founding American ideal that government should be of, by, and for the people—not an institution of permanent power. By introducing rotation in office, it renews public trust, ensures generational representation, and strengthens democratic resilience. It strikes a balance between institutional experience and civic renewal, protecting the judiciary’s independence while returning Congress to its intended function as a citizen legislature. Ultimately, this reform empowers future generations with a government that is more adaptable, equitable, and reflective of the people it serves.

The Executive Integrity and Divestment Act of 2025 establishes strict ethical and financial standards for the President and Vice President to prevent conflicts of interest and restore public trust in the Executive Branch. It amends the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require both officeholders to divest from all private business holdings within 90 days of taking office and to place their assets in independently managed blind trusts. These measures ensure that presidential decisions are made solely in the public interest, free from any financial influence or personal enrichment.

The legislation also criminalizes self-dealing and the use of public office for private gain. It prohibits the President and Vice President from influencing government actions that benefit their personal or family financial interests, as well as from accepting any emoluments or payments tied to their official duties. Violations are treated as felony offenses, subject to fines, imprisonment, removal from office, and permanent disqualification from holding future federal positions.

To ensure impartial enforcement, the Act creates an Independent Office of Government Ethics Enforcement (OGEE), empowered with investigative and prosecutorial authority. This office operates outside of political influence, with the ability to subpoena records, conduct inquiries, and refer cases to the Department of Justice. Together, these provisions aim to create a transparent, accountable, and corruption-resistant executive branch that serves only the American people.

The Democracy and Human Representation Amendment reaffirms a foundational truth of the American republic — that government exists to serve people, not corporations. By defining constitutional rights as belonging exclusively to natural persons, it restores human sovereignty in government and ensures that artificial entities — corporations, partnerships, and similar legal constructs — cannot claim the same inalienable protections as citizens. This distinction rebalances democracy by reaffirming that the voice of every individual voter carries equal moral and constitutional weight, uncorrupted by the disproportionate influence of organized financial power.

The amendment empowers Congress and the States to regulate, limit, or prohibit the use of money and assets in elections and policymaking. It declares unequivocally that money is not speech and that the First Amendment cannot be used as a shield for corruption. Through strict regulation of political spending and full transparency of all contributions and expenditures, it prevents artificial entities and wealthy interests from dominating public discourse. This shift creates a more level democratic playing field, ensuring elections are guided by ideas, not by checkbooks.

Finally, the amendment explicitly overturns Supreme Court precedents such as Citizens United v. FEC and Buckley v. Valeo, which equated money with speech and gave corporations undue constitutional privileges. It establishes a constitutional framework for public campaign financing so that every qualified candidate, regardless of wealth or connection, has an equal opportunity to compete. By returning political power to citizens and codifying transparency and fairness as national principles, this amendment reclaims democracy for the people — reaffirming that America’s government must always remain of, by, and for the people alone.

To reclaim our democracy, we must champion specific legislative and constitutional changes. Here are key proposals that address systemic issues and promote a more fair and representative government.

Beyond election finance and judicial term limits, other crucial reforms are needed to strengthen our democracy and ensure government accountability. These proposals target systemic issues, from legislative transparency to ethical conduct and the very definition of political influence.